LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Last Wednesday night, at a regular Pasadena City College Board of Trustees meeting, a “letter of concern” was delivered to the Trustees by approximately 38 members of the PCC Management Association (MA). Their concern is about the “state of the current Board of Trustees” and the future of Pasadena City College.
By Bruce Gibbs
The MA, according to the PCC website, is the “mechanism through which the deans, managers and supervisors of the college (exclusive of the Executive Committee) participate in shared governance.”
Mat Camara, acting President of the PCC Management Association, took the lead at Thursday’s meeting. He made the point that he has “served under seven superintendent/ presidents” in his fifteen years at PCC. He added, “Let that sink in for a moment.”
The current PCC Superintendent/ President is Erika Endrijonas, and her contract was approved by the Board in January of 2019. She is now a finalist for superintendent/president at another community college.
Camara made this point because the phenomenon of quick turnover among presidents or superintendents is considered to be bad for an academic institution. Mr. Camara reminded the Trustees that on April 11, 2022, “the superintendent/president and the board of Trustees received a vote of no confidence from our colleagues on the academic senate,” which represents the faculty.
Camara said that the “Board president [Sandra Chen Lau] and “two of the recently elected members have appeared to neglect their basic Trustee duties and responsibilities.”
What followed was a dramatic reading of parts of Board Bylaw 2200 which outlines Board duties and responsibilities, accompanied by experiences and anecdotes from members of the Management Association that revealed, disturbingly, how some Trustees are willfully neglecting to fulfill their duties.
Camara led and one by one different members took the microphone.
The list of grievances was unsettling to say the least.
One anecdote packed a wallop, and it involved Board President Sandra Chen Lau who, at a board meeting, “arbitrarily pulled” an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) submitted by the Management Association regarding their COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment). This, according to the speaker, was a “manipulation” and deprived the Board of a dialogue about the MOU. Transparency is required among school trustees and pulling the MOU was, according to the speaker, a violation of ACCJC standards which can put the accreditation of the college at risk.
It was also revealed that some Trustees refused to meet with members of the PCC Management Association who simply wanted to discuss concerns, which is their right. Camara thanked the few Trustees who did meet with them.
Another story was troubling. Management Association (MA) members had watched a recording of a March 7 Facilities Committee meeting and were “astounded” when they heard “several openly racist remarks.”
Also alarming was the story about a lunch organized for the Trustees and MA leadership. At one point, after the MA members asked the Board to expedite a “perfunctory” request, one Trustee “pounded their fist on the table” and “ranted” that the “buck stops with them.”
Another member strongly urged all Trustees to keep current on all training, which implied that Trustees were not engaging in regular professional development, and stated that the Trustees have not completed the required evaluation of Superintendent/President Endrijonas.
The Trustees were accused of micromanagement which is in conflict with their duties to delegate power and authority to the superintendent/president.
Mat Camara, in closing, reminded the Trustees that PCC had been the final stop for superintendent/presidents, but now it is possibly in danger of being considered a pass-through college. He asked if Board President Sandra Chen Lau had a replacement in mind for the superintendent/president’s position as she “spun the current Superintendent/President through the door.”
The Management Association members begin at the 2 hour and 54-minute mark:
Bruce Gibbs is a resident living in the San Gabriel Valley.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, please consider supporting the Colorado Boulevard’s journalism.
Billionaires, hedge fund owners and local imposters have a powerful hold on the information that reaches the public. Colorado Boulevard stands to serve the public interest – not profit motives.
While fairness guides everything we do, we know there is a right and a wrong position in the fight against racism and climate crisis while supporting reproductive rights and social justice. We provide a fresh perspective on local politics – one so often missing from so-called ‘local’ journalism.
You can access Colorado Boulevard’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. People like you, informed readers, keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence, and accessible to everyone.
Please consider supporting Colorado Boulevard today. Thank you. (Click to Support)
“Change and Accountability” means whatever the faculty union wants. Lau has always done whatever they want, even before she had the majority, which is why she pulled the COLA agreement without discussion. They told her to, She brought 3 more union lackeys onto the board all heavily funded by the union in last year’s campaigns. They don’t think independently, they are all just local party hacks. Burn it all down is a correct description of the union’s approach, just to get their way.
The newly elected members ran on “Change” and “Accountability”. They seem to be as bad, if not worse than the previous board. PCC is a lost cause due to the lack of leadership all around. It’s mind-boggling that Endrijonas is a finalist at SBCC and Mt. Sac! Standards are low though out the CCC system.
Yes, and when they try to have “change” and “accountability” at the college, people like a bunch of managers (78 out of 1400 employees at the school) put up to this by the PCC President, and of course the PCC Pres. who wants to continue her free reign, don’t like.
And what do you call it when three board members have an adjunct faculty member (who doesn’t even teach a class at the college) viciously and belligerently malign the President at every meeting with unfounded claims, misrepresenting that she speaks for all of faculty. Where’s the accountability in that?
PCC Staff (MM) WHERE IS THE PROOF that a bunch of mangers were put up to the “Letter of Concern” by the PCC President? WHERE? Do you have it?? Can you share it and back up your statement? You are a so-called “professor” that would certainly ask their students for PROOF when making a statement, writing a paper or a newsletter, etc. I would hope that when you do, you check and verify references. Are you taking notes from the Donald J. Trump playbook by making bizarre, unfounded and false statements that continue divide? Show the PROOF; you must have!
PCC has gone over the top. They have a policy that says any ethnic group that is less than 15% of the employees is underrepresented. Even when a group is less than 10% of the local population or the population in PCC’s area. It means people can say they are underrepresented and allege racism in hiring even when they are over-represented amongst PCC employees. Crazy stuff.
You know what’s racist? At the 3:30 min of this meeting an African-American new employee introduces herself and Executive Director of Institutional Effectiveness Crystal Kollross “claims” her and says “she’s mine no stealing.” https://youtu.be/A3l5bxe9xqA?t=181 and everyone laughs. That seems to be ok for Mat Camara, and everyone else at the table, from the PCC President Endrijonas to President Gena Lopez and Treasurer Shelagh Rose of the faculty senate, who go around touting equity, diversion, inclusion, liberatory educational practices, social justice, trauma-informed campus, etc etc etc. Hypocrites!
What’s your thing with Crystal…you seem to pick on her a lot? So she introduces a new employee and says she is hers and you think that is racist. I think you missed the total point of the MA’s message. Get help.