• *News & Headlines

      City of Pasadena Prevails in Lawsuit

      A dome with sun rays on it and snow in the mountains behind it

      Pasadena City Hall at winter time (Photo – W.K.)

      On February 24, a Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge dismissed a class action lawsuit challenging the annual transfer of revenue from the power fund to the City’s General Fund.

      By News Desk

      If Pasadena had been unsuccessful in the lawsuit, it faced the loss of approximately $18 million annually in General Fund monies. The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund, and provides a number of essential services to Pasadena residents and businesses.

      Lawsuit

      The lawsuit was originally filed in 2017, alleging that the use of electric rates to fund the transfer to the General Fund violates the California Constitution. Pasadena voters had established and confirmed Charter provisions allowing the General Fund transfer a total of seven times, dating back to 1934.

      In March 2020, the City was unsuccessful in obtaining a dismissal of the lawsuit, where the City had argued that Pasadena voters had approved the Charter-authorized transfer a total of seven times.  As such, in July 2020, the City Council placed the Charter provisions for the transfer on the ballot for the eighth time.  In November 2020, almost 84 percent of Pasadena voters resoundingly approved Measure P, confirming that voters clearly approve of having a portion of their electric rates fund the $18 million annual transfer to the General Fund.

      Measure P

      With Pasadena voter approval of Measure P, and a January 29 published (precedential) appellate decision approving of Sacramento’s utility fund transfer, Pasadena sought reconsideration in its case. The court’s decision yesterday reverses its March 2020 decision against Pasadena. Rather, the court decision yesterday recognizes that Measure P and the court decision on Sacramento’s transfer both require “new and different orders granting [Pasadena’s] motion for summary judgment.”

      Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo stated:

      I am pleased that justice prevailed. The transfer continues to be approved by Pasadena residents, and for good reason. Pasadena has proven that our residents have confidence in receiving high quality essential services, and that residents want to ensure that our General Fund and tax dollars are protected from class action lawsuits.

       

      Edited by Ann Hunnewell

      Support Independent Local Journalism

      We hope you enjoyed this article. We live in and care about this community.

      For more than a decade, Colorado Boulevard Newspaper has investigated local issues, asked difficult questions, and worked to hold power accountable—without shareholders, corporate agendas, or outside influence.

      Your support helps fund the time, research, and reporting needed to uncover stories that matter.

      A $5 gift or subscription helps keep local journalism strong.

      Please explore the many ways you could support us by clicking the blue button below.

      Support

      Author

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *