The Pasadena Unified School District received a new warning that failure to rescind its December 2025 school consolidation Board resolution could lead to a Brown Act lawsuit alleging that four trustees engaged in a months‑long pattern of private deliberations that violated California’s Brown Act before approving a controversial school‑consolidation resolution in December 2025.
By Rena Kurlander
According to the attorney who alleges the Brown Act violations, the board now has until June 14 to rescind Board Resolution 2852 or face litigation.
The June 9 letter sent to Superintendent Elizabeth Blanco and the full board, reiterates allegations previously made public: that Trustees Tina Fredericks, Scott Harden, Kim Kenne, and Yarma Velázquez coordinated through emails, text messages, and undisclosed meetings to secure the four votes needed to pass the resolution ahead of the December 11 meeting.
The letter details a series of written communications beginning in late October 2025, that were disclosed in response to Public Record Act requests, including:
- Proposed revisions and strategy discussions between Fredericks and Velázquez regarding the timing and scope of the resolution
- Private coordination among Fredericks, Harden, and Kenne about Superintendent Blanco’s role and potential conflicts
- Text messages from Harden referencing a “counter plan” and the need for Kenne to “lean on” Velázquez
- Two undisclosed meetings with consultants from Total School Solutions to discuss consolidation strategy
- A surge of messages between December 9 – 11 concerning proposed amendments, vote counts, and strategies to ensure the resolution passed
The June 9 letter asserts that these exchanges constitute prohibited serial meetings under Government Code §54952.2(b)(1), which bars a majority of a legislative body from privately discussing or deliberating on official business.
Resolution 2852, approved 4–3 with the four trustees voting in favor, directs the superintendent to provide ongoing updates on enrollment, equity indicators, and potential school closures. The June letter states that because the resolution imposes continuing obligations, the alleged Brown Act violations remain “ongoing.”
PUSD received an initial Cure and Correct demand on May 15. After receiving no response from the district, the June 9 letter now warns that litigation will follow if the board does not rescind the resolution by June 14. According to the letter, potential legal action would include subpoenas for phone records, written discovery, and videotaped depositions of the four trustees and outside consultants.
The letter concludes by asserting that the trustees’ denials of wrongdoing further justify judicial intervention and offers the board “one last opportunity to correct and cure, and avoid litigation.”










Leave a Reply